Posted by: DrAlanRae | July 30, 2009

Cash In – Funding with other people’s money.

And so, at last, we come back to finance. Business link research has always shown that access to finance comes after Sales and Marketing and regulatory compliance in the concerns of small businesses. Everything else comes nowhere.

So where do we get our money from. Do we bootstrap and max out our credit cards, do we borrow from family and friends. Do we find an angel, do we go to venture, do we hit the bank?

The answer as always depends on where you are, what you are trying to do and where do you want to go.

If you are setting up as a consultant, your needs are different from that of an inventor who’s got a revolutionary idea for a consumer product. (Most are going to get nowhere but occasionally you get James Dyson)

We’ve done 4 business start-ups to date.

The first one we each put in £3k but we relied on our business partner who had £20k in the bank (this was 1981)

The second one we had 2 second hand computers, a mailing list and the clothes we stood up in. (What does that tell you?)

The third was a management buy-out from a government project funded by an Angel – let’s call him Uncle Zak (not his real name). I was demoted from entrepreneur to Guru on account of my great age and wisdom which is why I’m writing this now.

The fourth time we walked out after an uncongenial merger and did another cold start. Although we were reasonably well off by then. We’re now in our 5th year of trading with a turnover of half a million.

Fundamentally you have to establish where you are in the overall scheme of things and whether you are running a 1 man band, a life style business or a growth business bent on dominating some global niche. One of the luminaries on Ecademy set up a club dealing with global finance. This diagram was developed to encapsulate what I learned from there and to summarise the overall process.  clip_image002

This tells us that there are several stages in getting finance. First of all you need to establish that you have got a business model that is going to work. If you just want a life-style business that earns a nice little profit employing up to about 10 people then Friends, fools and family will do nicely. If you are looking to try an invention this is where you should be looking. VC’s won’t touch you. They are only interested in funding things that they know are going to work. That’s why they are entrepreneurs.

There’s a lot of nonsense talked about entrepreneurs and risk. Actually you try and minimise the risk – don’t bet serious money until you know it’s likely to work and try and get an unfair advantage. Our unfair advantage in the current business is that my business partner was able to write the e-commerce engine herself – she’d been writing database apps for 25 years by then with about 8 years experience of putting them inside browsers. It saved us a really risky bet of about £30k on an unproven business model since all that was at stake was her time.

Next time I’ll talk a bit about Angels – and our experiences with them.

Posted by: DrAlanRae | July 14, 2009

You only have 12 hours a week – part 2

Our recent research project tells us that small business owners typically spend 12 hours a week promoting their company.

That’s all you’ve got to cover face to face sales and networking, conventional marketing and whatever you choose to do online – whether using Google ad-words, making use of social media or dipping your toe into the ocean that is twitter.

How should you spend your time? Our current research tells us that lead generation is the number one concern of the small business owner.  In this strange 21st century we don’t have time to prospect the way we did in the ’80s. Back then we did a lot of exhibitions, paper newsletters and cold calling on the phone.  We know that people don’t do that now – for example, only 14% of our sample uses telemarketing in any systematic way.

We found that most companies rely on networking for referrals and introductions. They also use workshops, PR and online advertising too but the focus is on face to face networking and social media..

We compared companies with local businesses (80% of their orders come within a 50 mile radius) and global/national ones – and checked whether the business is scalable or not.  A mail-order plants business is scalable since we can source more product if if we have more demand while a local organic vegetable business whose produce depends on its certification is not scalable.. The limiting factor is production because once the produce is sold – it sold. These businesses need different marketing strategies..

It turns out that the difference is local vs national business. For a local business networking locally will provide the leads you need. For a national business you need the extra reach and randomness that online working gives you.  Twice as many national businesses used linked in and twitter as did local businesses. (42% vs 18% for linked-in).

Online Vs Offline

And the same rules for building trust apply online and offline.
•    Be clear about what you do
•    Do what you say you will
•    Be easy to work with
•    Get back to people quickly

If you need help developing a strategic plan, are wondering about how to tell your story better and how to construct an effective marketing mix we have some new products to help you as well as plain old consultancy.

“12 hours a Week”  workshop

Based on our research findings this 3 hour workshop helps you work out the right balance between face to face and online networking and conventional marketing for your business. Includes new 80 page workbook and BrainMap tool. Arora Hotel Gatwick   17th July £85+VAT . You can book here.
Subscribe to our Newsletter

Posted by: DrAlanRae | July 3, 2009

You have 12 hours a week

I’ve been working quite hard on some new materials over the last month or so. A new web copywriting course and a workshop on how to support groups using social media.

However what’s been my real focus is a marketing workshop based on the findings of the last research project. This threw up some really interesting findings about under what circumstances it makes sense to use online media instead of focusing on face to face networking.

The survey itself revealed that the average small business owner spends 12 hours a week on promotion – sales, networking, online activity, conventional marketing. Everything you do has to fit into that envelope – so what to do?

Are you better off focusing on your local BNI branch and getting to know really well the 20-30 individuals who you hope will refer you the business that you need – or are you better off focusing on building an internet presence which will randomly connect you to people all over the world? Or a bit of each?

The last bit of analysis we did suggested that your strategy is going to depend on whether your business is local and whether it is scalable. We ended up by dividing our responders according to those criteria and this is the pattern we found.

Local Scalable

It turns out that the strategy to follow very much depends on which group you find yourself in.

The workshop will help you achieve 3 things

1) Become absolutely clear about your story – the narrative that connects you to your customers on an emotional level. Our research shows that this is absolutely critical for credibility and referrals

2) Decide how much online activity you should include in your strategy – and what other marketing tools will work for you

3) Give you some pointers on effective networking and a clear understanding of how to build and maintain a strong online presence suitable for your business without spending your life at it.

First outing of the Workshop is in the Gatwick Area 17th July. More details here. 

Posted by: DrAlanRae | June 23, 2009

Working Smarter.

Working Smarter

One of the issues that’s really come to the fore this year is the issue of the Carbon Footprint. Sustainability has become a hot topic with it’s inclusion in all public sector bidding together with a knock on effect into the private sector supply chains that supply them. This means that for a start you need to have a proper environmental policy. Lamely wittering about low energy light bulbs and recycling printer cartridges is not going to cut it.

When you combine this with the rise in the cost of diesel (which translates into more than double for the heating oil for our nursery) you can see that anything that allows people to work remotely and flexibly without travelling is going to be a GOOD THING.

So working smarter not only gets you some brownie points with the public sector bidding fraternity but also allows you to save fuel and transport costs. In our own business nearly all our orders come electronically or by referral. In terms of travel all the despatches are collected, produce is either collected or delivered by van and most business travel involves a 10 mile round trip to Hayward’s Heath followed by the train. Going to the Thames Valley still involves driving but increasingly we are trying to hold meetings either virtually or in central London where participants can meet using public transport.

Most of the IT tools that are needed were covered in the section on collaborative gangs – because most work that’s done remotely is either communication or writing reports or creating other documents or admin – apart from decentralised call centres that is!

The challenges for ordinary companies who aren’t one man bands fall into several categories.

1 – The tax and health and safety implications of having staff working from home.

2 – Keeping road warriors in contact with their central data store. Again the blackberry and Virtual Private Network have largely resolved these issues

3- Monitoring output.

This last seems to be the killer as we have evolved a management culture of presenteeism in the UK which is hard to break. Monitoring sales people is easy because they’re measured by results. People producing written work are also easy to monitor because either the volume of work produced to an acceptable standard is there or its not. The problem lies in admin work which is less easy to monitor.

As you might expect organisations like BT have behaved as early adopters here. They now have 63000 – 2/3 of the total workforce working remotely and flexibly. What follows is taken from a WorkWise case study. (http://www.workwise.org. was set up to promote remote and flexible working in the UK it has a list of accredited advisers of whom I am one. I have been working remotely using a laptop since 1996)

Management Issues

When flexible working was first introduced into BT managers were concerned about the lack of face to face contact with employees and how they could keep track of them on a day-today basis. Now the technology is able to bridge that gap and make the job easier but managers still have to work harder to create a team environment. They must be able to

They learnt to build teams remotely using technology and team-building skills. They also need to learn to manage by output, setting clear objectives for each individual and measuring against a score card. This is underpinned by BT’s culture which supports flexible working and regular appraisals.

Implementation

BT has put HR policies in place to ensure that flexible working and home working are implemented successfully. They want to be sure that the home office is ergonomically sound and insist on a health and safety check for all home workers.

Managers need good communications skills one-to-one and with the team. Although this is more difficult than with office based people, most employees have mobile phones and a growing proportion now have blackberries. Increasingly people have wireless enabled laptops and BT takes full advantage of the technology it sells to its corporate customers.

Employees need to let the company know what their preference is for working time. Mangers need to respect this and need to trust that the employee will get the work done without close supervision. This depends on the maturity of the employment relationship and BT runs a management development programme internally that supports the flexible working culture.

Conclusion

BT has been running a flexible working programme for so long that in most parts of the organisation it has become the norm. It has clear quantifiable data on the benefits and has the HR policies and support in place to help managers implement it effectively.

Our experience has been that it more than pays off, very rapidly.”

So the action points here are

clip_image002

1) make sure that the equipment is up to date and is used in a reviewed, ergonomic environment

2) Measure a range of different outputs.

3) Institute a combination of chats and environments for informal discussion. http://www.Ning.com is a great tool for this as it provides a social network in a box and can be used for customer aftercare as well as for enabling teams to communicate.

The illustration shows our Ning Punch above your weight community which we set up to support people who’ve been through the programme

4) Train managers in developing remote team building skills. Much of this is about treating people as grown-ups, being responsive, keeping them informed and working on the basis of defined, measurable objectives. We are developing some training materials based on these issues.

Finally some of our interviewees have developed environments of their own to allow people to collaborate and to effectively make markets. Mark Lee has set up an environment to allow tax advice specialists to sell their services to the mainstream accounting profession. You can see it here http://www.taxadvicenetwork.co.uk/

Perhaps the most ambitious approach is Michael Wolff’s http://www.Ki-work.com . This aims to provide a global remote working environment which will be run by subject experts in each of several hundred specialist topic areas. These will recruit their own network of consultants and will be able to bid for contracts to be delivered remotely across the world.

His marketing strategy is based very much on the networking tools we have discussed. Consultants will be sourced through Facebook which as its membership matures will become the chief space in which talent can be found. Contracts will be sourced via Linked-in whose transactional, corporate feeling environment gives a feeling of safety and respectability to those who have not yet jumped ship.

Posted by: DrAlanRae | June 15, 2009

Building your collaboration gang – Part 2

So what are the tools of choice?

http://www.Skype.com, http://docs.google.com and Docs and BaseCamp are 3 that should be in the frame for any aspiring gang creators.

clip_image002

Skype includes VOIP, video conferencing 1 to 1 only, teleconferencing (up to 5) and chat (up to 50 in a chat). It’s free if both parties are on Skype. It effectively revolutionises how you do business because any gang can have its own permanent running Skype chat. This means that anyone can raise a topic and it sits there until one of the others has time to deal with it.

It has a much greater immediacy to it than e-mail and is almost entirely opt-in. Because it multi-tasks its possible to have ongoing conversations while engaging in writing complex documents – like this one.

This is what it looks like and here is an example of an ongoing chat. As you can see there are about 50 people in this with topics constantly coming and going.

It can be used in a much tighter way between 5 people delivering a project together, Check it out at www.skype.com

Google Docs is a powerful tool that allows documents resembling word, excel and PowerPoint to be hosted by Google and accessed by you and your team. The real benefit is that you can have a team of several people working collaboratively on a spreadsheet at the same time, each updating their own sections. You can have a look at http://docs.google.com

BaseCamp is a product of 37 signals that also do a chat product and a hosted CRM application. I have been using it to support my projects for the last 18 months. It essentially gives you some space to store the definitive project documents, allows people to comment allows you to enter and agree milestones and track progress.

I have a fairly modest subscription of about £6 per month which allows me to run 3 live projects plus as many archived ones as necessary. It’s real benefit is that it deals with version control, saves you having to be constantly emailing files to everyone and manages the audit trail of emails as commented threads.

clip_image004

Because its all properly backed up it means that your documents are more secure than sitting on your own server at home.

Uploading files is easy and I’ve now run 5 projects using it.

Costs range from $12 per month for 3 live projects and 1 Gb storage up to $149 per month for unlimited projects and 50 Gb. The more expensive versions also contain basic project planning tools and timer recording.

You can allow your clients access to the environment too so that you can add transparency of project management to the other benefits to the customer of dealing with your organisation.

BaseCamp, in its larger capacity offerings is a secure, encrypted environment. This can be very important to clients as would be need for secure encrypted environments for Video Conferencing and chat.

Skype is a free environment but there are other, equivalent, products which for a modest monthly fee will deliver an encrypted and more powerful service. Megameetings,  for instance will offer video conferencing for 5 at its entry level price and will also offer the facility for secure teleconferencing with recording and transcript facilities.

These tools facilitate the development of groups of consultants functioning as consortia which will enable them to bid more successfully for contracts and deliver them more effectively.

This obviously has an impact on the whole smarter working agenda which we’re going to look at next.

Posted by: DrAlanRae | June 8, 2009

Building your gang (of collaborators)

As we mentioned in the section on building trust, one of the main drivers that people have when they’re networking is that they are looking for people to collaborate with.

Many people find themselves setting up as one man bands (independent consultants) later in life after a lifetime in a corporate. While the corporate world has some real downsides, if you are an expert in your field it has a number of advantages that the small business owner doesn’t have.

These include

  • People to do your admin for you
  • People to do your IT for you
  • People to do your selling for you
  • People that your skills complement to make a complete offering.

However life as a 1 man band is different. You have to either pay someone out of your earnings to do all the above – or you have to do it yourself.

It’s a truism that if you are delivering services yourself you can’t sell when you’re delivering and you can’t deliver when you’re selling. So you might consider forming a little gang of like minded people whose skills complement yours and form a consortium.

This lets you share the load of bidding and spreads the cost and time of customer acquisition. The importance of this can be judged from the preliminary returns from the research project. The average organisation spent about 14 hours on marketing per week which is what you might expect given that most were selling business services, less than half turned over more than £100,000 and employed more than 2 people.

So if the ratio of promotion and admin to delivery is approaching 1 to 1 it makes a great deal of sense to form a collaborative gang which will allow you to deliver a more complete offer to your client as well as spread the load of tendering.

Once trust is developed and you are in a position to start collaborating, the current development of the internet has made life very easy for you. Most of the tools you need, both for online networking and for collaborative working are either free or comparatively inexpensive.

You can even share subscriptions to streams of leads. Many government tenders are notified on portals like http://www.sell2wales.co.uk and http://www.direct2.gov.uk while you can also subscribe to services like Skillfair which will direct particular types of contracts your way.

Apart from email, the main tools you need are a tool to deliver voice over IP (VOIP) which will let you hold conference calls and run chats plus a document repository where you can store documents, manage the email threads and generally work collaboratively. It’s only about 8 years since that was effectively beyond the resources of even a 20-50 person company. So the power of broadband has effectively changed the balance of power for the individual worker. Effectively all you need is a laptop with a wi-fi broadband connection and you can work anywhere. More to the point you can project manage from anywhere too.

clip_image002

We’ll review the tools that you can use next time.

Posted by: DrAlanRae | May 26, 2009

Learning to Learn – part 2

If you are creating an organisation from scratch, then it’s relatively easy. If you are trying to transform an existing situation then you may need to surface and deal with the mental models that the incumbents are using. For instance developing meaningful IT training for small businesses involves tackling and neutralising the “official” mental model that there are IT users on the one hand, IT professionals on the other, and nothing in between, Dealing with Digital Divide issues means dissolving the mental model that internet connections are three times as expensive as they really are and that there is nothing of value out there to someone like me.

The really big switch is towards team learning. Our educational system has been geared to the industrial model for 150 years. It favours broadcast activity. Someone on high has the ideas and these are propagated to the serfs and minions.

However real learning is collaborative and the tools of the internet facilitate this. We have Skype, BaseCamp, social media and MegaMeetings to facilitate idea creation and deployment. Where people understand they can create and disseminate their ideas the digital divide melts away.

This has always been true. The spirit of the age can be seen in the music and gene patenting industries where the aim of the game is to end up with all the counters so you can hold the world to ransom by OWNING the knowledge. However scientific and engineering organisations have more often than not progressed by co-creation. The first company I worked for made Steelworks cranes. Each one was different and co-invented by our chief project engineer and theirs. This learning was then retained to improve future designs. We built several software products like this – through collaborating with the customers.

However to retain the gains whatever you do has to be embedded in systems thinking. The business operates as a whole – so imagination and new product development has to be turned into reliable product delivery.

And it has to fit the company’s path through the waves of change.

A lead thinker in this area was Stafford Beer who amongst other things created a real time production monitoring system for the Chilean Government in the early 70s before the blue meanies decided that they wouldn’t tolerate a democratically elected Marxist regime in the world.

His systems model essentially states that the operations people know what they’re doing and can organise themselves to deliver as more or less autonomous units aligned around a vision. Central management’s job is to create a plan and have 2 independent monitoring units one of which looks inside and asks the question “are we on plan?” while the other looks outside and asks the question “is this plan still any good?”

At the same time it has to ensure that shared vision that this is a learning organisation focusing on whatever it does is grounded in the awareness of the whole organisation.

The end game of our CAD business was that we wanted to expand it and moved south in the summer of 1995. We had spent the previous 18 months training the team to be self-organising. In the event we over-reached ourselves and had to close the company 6 months later. But freed of our pretensions to be software developers, the team ran a good business with a local customer base for another 8 years.

Posted by: DrAlanRae | May 15, 2009

Learning to learn – part 1

Given that a successful business is going to have to hop growth curves to survive or grow, it turns out that your only sustainable source of competitive advantage is your ability to learn

Sweet Spot Growth2

You may remember this picture from earlier on. What it says is that you can’t stand still. If you’re good you catch the next wave early enough and grow on it. If you’re average you catch the next wave and let go of the old one. However it’s difficult to know much in advance what the next relevant one will be. One of the hallmarks of effective companies is that they are able to develop new products and services from a well established organic base.

To create these and implement them in a way that’s operationally sound you need to be able to take the team with you – you need to be able to learn how to find the new opportunity and implement it – in a way that’s not been done before. This means that you have to take your team up a learning curve. If you can do this faster and more effectively than the next company then you will work in the market place.

So how do you learn to learn? Most of us have the creativity driven out of us by the education system as it is lovingly tended by the Ministry for the Prevention of Learning. It tends to produce by numbers people who do things by the book, who can’t think things through from first principles and who are stuck in a low level “evidence based” view of the world. In extreme cases they regard their bodies as a way of getting their heads to meetings. (I wish I’d said that – actually it was Sir Ken Robinson in his talk at TED)

The real world is more messy than that – you need to try things. You need to carry out a Tango with the market place. Product creation and launch is a physical process. You can’t do it intellectually in a back room.

So we need to take note of what is known about learning to learn. The expert in this area is a man called Peter Senge. So the rest of this section is a summary of his main ideas – which I think is fundamental to business success in today’s market.

Senge’s ideas were published in a book called the 5th Discipline which is well worth a read because as well as dealing with the characteristics of the learning organisation he has a nice little appendix describing some archetypal binds that organisations fall into.

Basically he says that creating a learning organisation needs you to build a culture that celebrates and practices 5 key skills. If any one is missing then you can’t create a learning organisation. They are

  • Personal Mastery
  • Mental Models
  • Shared Vision
  • Team learning
  • Systems Thinking

What these mean in practice is that one of the tasks of leadership is to be continually evolving, growing and learning from the environment and to distil this experience into a model of the world that facilitates process for those around you.

To create a learning organisation, the leader must

· Do this consciously

· Demonstrate it to others

· Encourage them to do the same.

The interaction of a group of people working together on real projects that they all have a strong interest in achieving, creates a shared vision around a common purpose. If articulated and pictured this can become the brand. Internal branding in a service business is fundamentally about creating and propagating this shared vision throughout the organisation.

More about the “how” in the next post.

Posted by: DrAlanRae | May 11, 2009

Building Trust part 2

Most people who responded to the survey seemed not to have a systematic process of developing trust. A few wanted to work on a project with them first, but several relied on randomness and the “right feel”

To recommend someone they met networking, the more cautious souls would want to see their work before recommending. If the skills were rare or there was a good match between the buyer and the seller, the majority of respondents would mention them with a caveat that they had no personal experience.

However what was really interesting was that the same indicators of trust were found across the sample. However we sliced the sample, US vs Europe, Big vs Small, On-line junkies vs avoiders, the same characteristics and behaviours led to the growth of trust. Let’s list them.

As well as being crystal clear about what you do, doing what you say and knowing your subject, the key skills of networking and building trust were thought to be

  • An attitude of Givers Gain
  • Listening Skills
  • Rapid follow up
  • Enthusiastic can do attitude
  • Trustworthy and sincere

Givers Gain (also sometimes called “paying it forward”) means doing favours and passing referrals on first and wait for the law of karma to work on your behalf later when you have enough good karma points in the bank. Thomas Power has even attempted to quantify this as 50 gives = 1 get. Spamming everyone with business cards and the “always be closing” approach seems not to work in this environment.

This is in line with Cialdini’s identification of the principle of reciprocation as one of the cornerstones of building strong human relationships. The other main ones are Commitment and Consistency, Social Proof, Liking, Authority and Scarcity. This is all summarised in his book “Influence – Science and Practice” which I would say is a must for anyone serious about building a successful business presence.

If you can build and maintain a good reputation for competence in a sought after area and are generally pleasant to deal with, networking is a great way of leveraging your ability to reach more customers.

It involves

  • Looking good – all the research shows that the beautiful get more business. If you can’t look beautiful at least try and look symmetrical. It may not be PC – but that’s how our heads are wired.
  • Being absolutely clear about what you do.
  • Being consistent
  • Being easy to talk to
  • Listening a lot
  • Finding helpful connections for the other person.

However above all you have to be clear about what you want out of it – be it collaborators, referrals, employees, introductions to finance. If you are helpful and you let other people know clearly what you do and what you want, consistently – then the magic will start to occur.

None of this is really new of course. Here are 2 quotes that sum it up

1) You have 2 ears and 1 mouth – use them in that proportion. From Every sales course you’ve ever been on.

2) Just tell them what they want to hear. But there’s a catch. You have to mean it. Dale Carnegie didn’t quite put it like that – but that’s the core message of “How to win friends and influence people” if you ask me.

Posted by: DrAlanRae | April 29, 2009

Developing Trust – Part 1

This brings us neatly to the issue of building trust and developing a reputation.

I have always thought that reputation is made up of 3 components

  • Knowing your stuff
  • Being able to deliver
  • Being likeable or at least easy to work with.

I asked my customers what they liked about me and items one and 2 were pretty much as per the list. In my case number 3 was “you say bollocks a lot”. This is called personal branding.

One school of thought is that when you are networking you should be looking for advocates rather than sales. Our current research projects have been looking into this and we are currently testing a model that looks like this.

clip_image002

As you can see it grows by stages. In most cases you will probably have to meet up – although sometimes you don’t – I was project manager for a series of policy documents that we wrote for the Welsh Government last year. I never actually met one of the team –although other team players knew them.

In most cases you trust people that you’ve got to know and with whom you’ve worked on something that’s not a life or death project. As time goes on you work with them on progressively larger contracts until eventually you feel comfortable to put them into bat on your behalf.

Personally I am in several groupings of people that have got to know each other over the years. Some from my previous network, some that have come about through my membership of online networking groups.

In our current research project, we asked some open ended questions about how trust develops – for the most part it’s a combination of early opinion and likeability reinforced with recommendation, seeing them at work or experience of their deliverables. Liking and experience seemed to be the most influential components at least in the preliminary results.

I’ll tell you what they said in the next post

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »

Categories